Paid Ads · Performance Analysis

Dynamic Man — Paid Ads Report

Complete analysis of paid ad performance across Meta. Tracking what's working, what's not, and where to go next. Updated weekly.

Round 1 · May 19 – Jun 8, 2026
$232
Total Spend
31
Total Leads
$7.50
Avg CPL
3,962
Impressions
252
Link Clicks
6.4%
Avg CTR
Section 1

Funnel Analysis

Conversion rates at each step of the paid traffic funnel. The biggest drop-off is from landing page view to opt-in — the landing page is the primary optimization lever.

Ad → Link Click
6.4% CTR

Above average for cold traffic (benchmark: >2%). The creative is doing its job getting attention and clicks. A3V1 leads at 8.3% CTR.

Impressions 3,962
Link Clicks 252
Avg CPM $58.68
Link Click → Landing Page View
86.5%

Strong page load rate. 218 of 252 clicks actually landed on training.patstedman.com. Minimal drop-off from slow loading or bouncing.

Link Clicks 252
Landing Page Views 218
Landing Page View → Opt-in
14.2%

31 leads from 218 landing page views. Not bad for cold traffic, but this is the biggest optimization opportunity. Improving this rate has the highest leverage on CPL.

Landing Page Views 218
Leads 31
Opt-in Rate 14.2%
Opt-in → Application
Too Early

Zero applications from these 31 leads so far. Expected — cold traffic enters a long email nurture cycle. Coaching clients often convert 6–24 months after first touch. Tracking this over time will reveal the true value of paid traffic.

Section 2

Ad Performance Breakdown

Every ad from Round 1, ranked by leads generated. Each row includes the creative concept, format, and all key metrics.

Ad Format Hook Spend Imp. Clicks LPV Leads Verdict
A3V1 Static Matchmaker can't make her want you $136.55 2,253 187 159 18 Marry
A8V1 Founder Signing up with her just cause she's hot $48.37 746 23 23 6 Fuck
A1V1 Static Spotting the wrong woman $6.50 147 6 5 4 Fuck
A9V1 Studio You're dating timewaster women $13.26 276 13 8 2 Fuck
A5V1 Founder You are optimizing for the wrong thing $7.58 123 5 5 1 Fuck
A7V1 Founder No opener will find you the right woman $3.39 49 7 6 0 Investigate
A2V1 Static 65 Men. 65 Wives. $5.12 126 5 4 0 Kill
Ad #5 Static (Generic / unnamed) $7.06 133 4 3 0 Kill
A4V1 Static Alone at a wedding $3.41 75 1 0 0 Kill
A6V1 Founder Going on dates is a bad strategy $1.05 30 1 0 0 Kill
Section 3

Cost Analysis

What it costs to reach, click, land, and convert at each stage of the funnel. Ranked by Cost Per Lead (lowest = best).

Ad Hook Spend CPM CPC Cost / LPV CPL Verdict
A1V1 Spotting the wrong woman $6.50 $44.22 $1.08 $1.30 $1.63 Fuck
A9V1 You're dating timewaster women $13.26 $48.04 $1.02 $1.66 $6.63 Fuck
A3V1 Matchmaker can't make her want you $136.55 $60.61 $0.73 $0.86 $7.59 Marry
A5V1 You are optimizing for the wrong thing $7.58 $61.63 $1.52 $1.52 $7.58 Fuck
A8V1 Signing up with her just cause she's hot $48.37 $64.84 $2.10 $2.10 $8.06 Fuck
A7V1 No opener will find you the right woman $3.39 $69.18 $0.48 $0.57 Investigate
A2V1 65 Men. 65 Wives. $5.12 $40.63 $1.02 $1.28 Kill
Ad #5 (Generic / unnamed) $7.06 $53.08 $1.77 $2.35 Kill
A4V1 Alone at a wedding $3.41 $45.47 $3.41 Kill
A6V1 Going on dates is a bad strategy $1.05 $35.00 $1.05 Kill
Section 4

Conversion Rates

Percentage rates at each funnel stage. CTR measures ad hook strength. LPV Rate measures page load quality. Opt-in Rate measures landing page effectiveness. Ranked by opt-in rate (highest = best).

Ad Hook CTR LPV Rate Opt-in Rate Frequency Verdict
A1V1 Spotting the wrong woman 4.1% 83.3% 80.0% 1.32 Fuck
A9V1 You're dating timewaster women 4.7% 61.5% 25.0% 1.16 Fuck
A5V1 You are optimizing for the wrong thing 4.1% 100.0% 20.0% 1.12 Fuck
A3V1 Matchmaker can't make her want you 8.3% 85.0% 11.3% 1.59 Marry
A8V1 Signing up with her just cause she's hot 3.1% 100.0% 26.1% 1.29 Fuck
A7V1 No opener will find you the right woman 14.3% 85.7% 0% 1.07 Investigate
A2V1 65 Men. 65 Wives. 4.0% 80.0% 0% 1.08 Kill
Ad #5 (Generic / unnamed) 3.0% 75.0% 0% 1.21 Kill
A4V1 Alone at a wedding 1.3% 0% 1.19 Kill
A6V1 Going on dates is a bad strategy 3.3% 0% 1.20 Kill
Section 5

Winners — Scale & Iterate

Ads that generated leads. Ranked by CPL. These are the concepts to keep running, increase budget on, and create variations of.

Ad Format Hook Spend Leads CPL CTR Opt-in Rate CPM CPC Verdict
A1V1 Static Spotting the wrong woman $6.50 4 $1.63 4.1% 80.0% $44.22 $1.08 Fuck
A9V1 Studio You're dating timewaster women $13.26 2 $6.63 4.7% 25.0% $48.04 $1.02 Fuck
A3V1 Static Matchmaker can't make her want you $136.55 18 $7.59 8.3% 11.3% $60.61 $0.73 Marry
A5V1 Founder You are optimizing for the wrong thing $7.58 1 $7.58 4.1% 20.0% $61.63 $1.52 Fuck
A8V1 Founder Signing up with her just cause she's hot $48.37 6 $8.06 3.1% 26.1% $64.84 $2.10 Fuck
A1V1 — Movie Poster / Vetting
Fuck Static

Hook: "Spotting the wrong woman"

Best CPL in the entire round by a mile — $1.63 per lead. 80% opt-in rate (4 of 5 LPVs converted). Tiny sample needs validation at higher spend, but the vetting angle clearly resonates. Priority #1 to scale.

A3V1 — Matchmaker Countersignal
Marry Static

Hook: "The matchmaker can't make her want you"

Meta's clear winner. Got 59% of total budget ($136 of $232). 8.3% CTR is exceptional for cold traffic. Cheapest CPC at $0.73. The 11.3% opt-in rate is lower than some others, but proven at volume. Make variations immediately.

A8V1 — Female Dating Coach
Fuck Founder

Hook: "You're signing up with her just cause she's hot"

26.1% opt-in rate with 100% LPV rate (everyone who clicked actually landed and a quarter opted in). Higher CPC at $2.10, but strong conversion once they arrive. Drama + text hook working well.

A9V1 — Studio / Timewasters
Fuck Studio

Hook: "You're dating timewaster women"

$6.63 CPL and the lowest CPC of any winner at $1.02. Cheapest to get clicks, decent conversion. Pat should film more studio variations of this concept.

Section 6

Losers & Investigations

Ads that generated zero leads. Kill these and reallocate budget to winners and new tests.

Ad Format Hook Spend Clicks LPV Leads CTR CPM CPC Verdict
A7V1 Founder No opener will find you the right woman $3.39 7 6 0 14.3% $69.18 $0.48 Investigate
A2V1 Static 65 Men. 65 Wives. $5.12 5 4 0 4.0% $40.63 $1.02 Kill
Ad #5 Static (Generic / unnamed) $7.06 4 3 0 3.0% $53.08 $1.77 Kill
A4V1 Static Alone at a wedding $3.41 1 0 0 1.3% $45.47 $3.41 Kill
A6V1 Founder Going on dates is a bad strategy $1.05 1 0 0 3.3% $35.00 $1.05 Kill
A7V1 — No Opener Will Find You the Right Woman
Investigate Founder

14.3% CTR and $0.48 CPC — cheapest clicks in the entire round — but zero leads. Classic congruence problem: the hook promises a specific insight about openers, but the landing page is a general training opt-in. The people clicking want the specific thing the ad promised. Either broaden the hook or create a landing page that echoes this specific promise. The click magnetism here is real — it just needs somewhere congruent to land.

A4V1 — Alone at a Wedding
Kill Static

1.3% CTR and $3.41 CPC — worst in both categories. Direct pain imagery. Men scroll past pain they don't want to sit in. Cold traffic doesn't respond to being made to feel bad.

A2V1 — 65 Men. 65 Wives.
Kill Static

Decent CTR (4.0%) and cheap CPC ($1.02), but zero opt-ins. The big promise / social proof angle may work for warm audiences who know Pat, but cold traffic doesn't have the context to believe it. AI creative quality may have hurt too. Save this angle for retargeting.

Creative Intelligence

What the Data Tells Us

The patterns behind what works and what doesn't, extracted from Round 1 results mapped against creative strategy.

Section 7

Creative Patterns

Countersignal Hooks Win

Top 3 performers all position Pat against an alternative the prospect has already considered: matchmakers, female dating coaches, timewaster dates. This outperforms direct pain and direct promise by a wide margin.

Vetting > Attraction

A1's "spotting the wrong woman" angle hit $1.63 CPL. ~40% of Pat's clients don't need to attract women — they need to choose better. This is undertested and high-potential.

Static Beat Video (This Round)

A3 (static, Marry) and A1 (static, best CPL) outperformed all founder and studio videos. Static may work better for cold traffic because the message is processed instantly vs. requiring 3+ seconds of video attention.

Direct Pain Doesn't Open

A4 ("Alone at a wedding") had the worst CTR at 1.3%. Cold traffic scrolls past imagery that makes them feel bad. They engage with content that makes them feel understood or curious.

High CTR ≠ High Conversion

A7 proves it: 14.3% CTR but zero opt-ins. Specific hooks that don't match the landing page create a curiosity click that dies on arrival. The landing page must echo the ad's promise.

Big Promise Falls Flat Cold

A2's "65 Men. 65 Wives." is great social proof — for people who already know Pat. Cold traffic doesn't have the context to believe it. Save proof-heavy angles for retargeting and email.

Section 8

Static vs. Founder vs. Studio

Static Image Ads
4 Ads

A1, A2, A3, A4. The clear winners came from this format. A3 (Marry) and A1 (best CPL) are both static. A2 and A4 are both kills, but their failure is angle-driven, not format-driven. Static allows the message to be processed instantly.

Leads 22
Spend $151.58
CPL (winners only) $6.50
Founder Video Ads
4 Ads

A5, A6, A7, A8. Mixed results. A8 (female dating coach) performed well with drama + text hook. A5 needs congruence check. A6 and A7 are kills. Pat's on-camera presence is an asset, but the hook matters more than the format.

Leads 7
Spend $60.39
CPL (A8 only) $8.06
Studio Video Ads
1 Ad

A9 only. $6.63 CPL on small sample. Studio quality may add credibility for cold audiences. Pat filming more variations is the right next step. Need more data before drawing format conclusions.

Leads 2
Spend $13.26
CPL $6.63
Action Items

What to Do Next

Prioritized actions for the next round of ads, based on Round 1 data and creative analysis.

Section 9

Next Round Game Plan

  1. Scale A3V1 — Make 2–3 variations of the matchmaker countersignal conceptDifferent headlines, different imagery, same angle. This is the proven winner.
  2. Give A1V1 more budget — Validate the $1.63 CPL at higher spendIf it holds, this becomes the new Marry. If it regresses, we know it was sample-size noise.
  3. Kill A2, A4, A6, Ad #5 immediatelyZero leads, no signal worth chasing. Reallocate budget to winners and new tests.
  4. Test countersignal vs. AI/ChatGPT dating advicePat has killer positioning here ("That is not advice. That is a mirror with a thesaurus.") and it's completely untested in ads. High potential.
  5. Get Pat to film A9 variations in studioStudio format showed promise at $6.63 CPL. The timewaster/vetting angle + production quality could scale.
  6. Test A8's drama style with other conceptsThe controversy/callout format works. Apply it to new hooks beyond female dating coaches.
  7. Investigate A7's congruence gap14.3% CTR proves the hook is magnetic. Fix the landing page match or broaden the hook, and this could convert.
  8. Consider landing page optimization14.2% opt-in rate is the biggest single lever. Even a 5% improvement in opt-in rate drops CPL meaningfully across all ads.
Section 10

Angles to Test

Untested hooks drawn from Pat's positioning, email copy, and the belief framework. Prioritized by alignment with Round 1 winners.

Countersignal: AI / ChatGPT
High Priority

"That is not advice. That is a mirror with a thesaurus." — Positions Pat against the thing every man has already tried. Timely, sharp, and directly in Pat's voice. Static or founder format.

Countersignal: YouTube / Free Content
High Priority

"If random information was going to fix your dating life, it would have worked by now." — Attacks the consumption-without-action pattern. Resonates with the "smart but stuck" segment.

Vetting: Wrong Woman Variations
High Priority

More movie-poster style statics on the vetting theme. "You don't have a dating problem. You have a selection problem." Expands on A1's winning concept.

Married Man / Coasting
Medium

"Your relationship is a 6 out of 10 and you know it." — Targets MC1 (coasting husband) segment. Untested in ads but strong in email. Could open a new audience pocket.

Diagnostic / Blind Spots
Medium

"If you could see your blind spots, they wouldn't be blind spots." — Positions coaching as diagnostic precision. May work better as retargeting than cold.